Clintons to Testify as Epstein Files Spark Allegations of Cover-Up
Published 16 February 2026
Highlights
- Hillary Clinton accuses the Trump administration of a "cover-up" regarding Jeffrey Epstein files, urging full disclosure.
- The Clintons are set to testify before Congress on February 26 and 27, marking the first such appearance by a former president in over 40 years.
- Millions of Epstein-related files have been released, but lawmakers argue the disclosure is incomplete.
- UN experts suggest Epstein's crimes may constitute crimes against humanity, urging further investigation.
- Prince Andrew faces pressure to testify about his connections to Epstein, though he denies any wrongdoing.
-
Rewritten Article
Clintons to Testify as Epstein Files Spark Allegations of Cover-Up
Hillary Clinton has accused the Trump administration of deliberately withholding critical files related to Jeffrey Epstein, alleging a "cover-up" in the handling of documents that could shed light on the late financier's extensive criminal activities. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Clinton urged the Department of Justice to expedite the release of all Epstein-related files, which she claims are being "slow-walked."
Congressional Testimony Looms
The Clintons are scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee on February 26 and 27, marking the first time a former U.S. president will appear before a congressional panel in over four decades. The couple has called for their hearings to be public, emphasizing transparency. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant," Hillary Clinton stated, reiterating their commitment to full disclosure.
Incomplete File Releases
Despite the release of millions of files by the Department of Justice, lawmakers, including Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie, argue that the disclosure remains insufficient. Massie has called for the release of internal memos that detail past prosecutorial decisions regarding Epstein and his associates. The files have implicated numerous high-profile individuals, including former President Bill Clinton, who maintains he severed ties with Epstein two decades ago.
UN Experts Call for Further Investigation
A panel of UN experts has suggested that the crimes documented in the Epstein files could meet the legal threshold for crimes against humanity. The experts highlighted the systematic nature and global reach of the offenses, urging an independent investigation into how such crimes persisted for so long. They also criticized the handling of sensitive victim information, which has left many survivors feeling retraumatized.
Pressure on Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew, who has faced allegations related to Epstein, continues to deny any wrongdoing. He settled a lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, in 2022 without admitting liability. U.S. officials and Giuffre's family have increased pressure on Andrew to testify before the Oversight Committee.
-
Scenario Analysis
The upcoming congressional testimonies by the Clintons could potentially shift public focus and political discourse, especially if new revelations emerge. The pressure on the Department of Justice to release all Epstein-related files may intensify, potentially leading to further legal and political ramifications. Should the UN experts' call for a broader investigation gain traction, it could result in international scrutiny and legal actions against those implicated in Epstein's network. As for Prince Andrew, any decision to testify could have significant implications for his public image and legal standing.
Hillary Clinton has accused the Trump administration of deliberately withholding critical files related to Jeffrey Epstein, alleging a "cover-up" in the handling of documents that could shed light on the late financier's extensive criminal activities. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Clinton urged the Department of Justice to expedite the release of all Epstein-related files, which she claims are being "slow-walked."
Congressional Testimony Looms
The Clintons are scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee on February 26 and 27, marking the first time a former U.S. president will appear before a congressional panel in over four decades. The couple has called for their hearings to be public, emphasizing transparency. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant," Hillary Clinton stated, reiterating their commitment to full disclosure.
Incomplete File Releases
Despite the release of millions of files by the Department of Justice, lawmakers, including Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie, argue that the disclosure remains insufficient. Massie has called for the release of internal memos that detail past prosecutorial decisions regarding Epstein and his associates. The files have implicated numerous high-profile individuals, including former President Bill Clinton, who maintains he severed ties with Epstein two decades ago.
UN Experts Call for Further Investigation
A panel of UN experts has suggested that the crimes documented in the Epstein files could meet the legal threshold for crimes against humanity. The experts highlighted the systematic nature and global reach of the offenses, urging an independent investigation into how such crimes persisted for so long. They also criticized the handling of sensitive victim information, which has left many survivors feeling retraumatized.
Pressure on Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew, who has faced allegations related to Epstein, continues to deny any wrongdoing. He settled a lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, in 2022 without admitting liability. U.S. officials and Giuffre's family have increased pressure on Andrew to testify before the Oversight Committee.
What this might mean
The upcoming congressional testimonies by the Clintons could potentially shift public focus and political discourse, especially if new revelations emerge. The pressure on the Department of Justice to release all Epstein-related files may intensify, potentially leading to further legal and political ramifications. Should the UN experts' call for a broader investigation gain traction, it could result in international scrutiny and legal actions against those implicated in Epstein's network. As for Prince Andrew, any decision to testify could have significant implications for his public image and legal standing.
