Jeremy Vine Testifies Against Joey Barton Over Defamatory Social Media Posts
In This Article
HIGHLIGHTS
- Jeremy Vine testified that Joey Barton's social media posts falsely labeling him a "paedophile" left him feeling "physically unsafe" and "devastated".
- Barton, facing 12 counts of sending grossly offensive communications, denies all charges, claiming no intent to cause distress.
- The court heard that Barton likened female commentators to notorious criminals, prompting Vine to respond, escalating the online exchange.
- In June 2024, Barton settled a civil case with Vine, agreeing to pay a total of £110,000 in damages and legal costs.
- Vine expressed concerns over his safety, fearing Barton's followers might act on the inflammatory posts.
In a high-profile case at Liverpool Crown Court, broadcaster Jeremy Vine has testified against former footballer Joey Barton, accusing him of making defamatory social media posts that left Vine feeling "physically unsafe." Barton, 43, is charged with 12 counts of sending grossly offensive electronic communications with intent to cause distress or anxiety, charges he denies.
Allegations and Reactions
The controversy began in January 2024 when Barton, a former Manchester City player with 2.7 million followers on the social media platform X, posted messages accusing Vine of being a "nonce," a derogatory term implying paedophilia. Vine, 60, described the allegations as "despicable" and testified that they caused him significant distress and sleepless nights. He also expressed concern that Barton's posts could incite his followers to harm him, leading Vine to take security precautions.
Escalating Online Exchange
The court heard that the online altercation was sparked by Barton's posts comparing female football commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko to infamous criminals Fred and Rose West. Vine, shocked by the comparison, responded with a comment questioning Barton's mental state, which Barton countered with further inflammatory remarks. Barton later posted an image of Vine with a caption suggesting he should be reported to the police if seen near a primary school.
Legal Proceedings and Settlements
In June 2024, Barton agreed to settle a civil case with Vine, paying £75,000 in damages for defamation and harassment, along with legal costs. A further settlement saw Barton pay an additional £35,000. Barton also issued a public apology on X, acknowledging the serious nature of his unfounded allegations against Vine.
Courtroom Testimonies
During the trial, Vine recounted the emotional toll of the accusations, stating that his reputation was "stripped" by someone he had never met. He emphasized the danger posed by Barton's posts, noting that determined individuals could easily discover his home address. Despite the distress caused, Vine maintained that his initial response to Barton was intended to support the female commentators targeted by Barton's remarks.
WHAT THIS MIGHT MEAN
As the trial continues, the outcome could set a significant precedent for how social media conduct is treated under UK law, particularly concerning the balance between free speech and harmful communication. If Barton is found guilty, it may lead to stricter regulations and greater accountability for public figures on social media platforms. Legal experts suggest that this case highlights the growing need for clear guidelines on online harassment and defamation, potentially influencing future legislation. Meanwhile, public figures may become more cautious in their online interactions, aware of the potential legal ramifications of their statements.
Related Articles
French and UK Authorities Intensify Investigations into Elon Musk's X and Grok AI
New Epstein Files Reveal Extensive Ties to Influential Figures Amid Allegations of Document Withholding
Gorton and Denton By-Election: Labour Faces Challenges Amid Scandal and Candidate Announcements
Global Backlash Forces X to Restrict Grok AI Amid Deepfake Controversy
X Faces Scrutiny Over AI-Generated Deepfakes Amid UK Legal Compliance Efforts
MPs Exit X Amid Grok AI Controversy Over Deepfake Images
Jeremy Vine Testifies Against Joey Barton Over Defamatory Social Media Posts
In This Article
Ethan Brooks| Published HIGHLIGHTS
- Jeremy Vine testified that Joey Barton's social media posts falsely labeling him a "paedophile" left him feeling "physically unsafe" and "devastated".
- Barton, facing 12 counts of sending grossly offensive communications, denies all charges, claiming no intent to cause distress.
- The court heard that Barton likened female commentators to notorious criminals, prompting Vine to respond, escalating the online exchange.
- In June 2024, Barton settled a civil case with Vine, agreeing to pay a total of £110,000 in damages and legal costs.
- Vine expressed concerns over his safety, fearing Barton's followers might act on the inflammatory posts.
In a high-profile case at Liverpool Crown Court, broadcaster Jeremy Vine has testified against former footballer Joey Barton, accusing him of making defamatory social media posts that left Vine feeling "physically unsafe." Barton, 43, is charged with 12 counts of sending grossly offensive electronic communications with intent to cause distress or anxiety, charges he denies.
Allegations and Reactions
The controversy began in January 2024 when Barton, a former Manchester City player with 2.7 million followers on the social media platform X, posted messages accusing Vine of being a "nonce," a derogatory term implying paedophilia. Vine, 60, described the allegations as "despicable" and testified that they caused him significant distress and sleepless nights. He also expressed concern that Barton's posts could incite his followers to harm him, leading Vine to take security precautions.
Escalating Online Exchange
The court heard that the online altercation was sparked by Barton's posts comparing female football commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko to infamous criminals Fred and Rose West. Vine, shocked by the comparison, responded with a comment questioning Barton's mental state, which Barton countered with further inflammatory remarks. Barton later posted an image of Vine with a caption suggesting he should be reported to the police if seen near a primary school.
Legal Proceedings and Settlements
In June 2024, Barton agreed to settle a civil case with Vine, paying £75,000 in damages for defamation and harassment, along with legal costs. A further settlement saw Barton pay an additional £35,000. Barton also issued a public apology on X, acknowledging the serious nature of his unfounded allegations against Vine.
Courtroom Testimonies
During the trial, Vine recounted the emotional toll of the accusations, stating that his reputation was "stripped" by someone he had never met. He emphasized the danger posed by Barton's posts, noting that determined individuals could easily discover his home address. Despite the distress caused, Vine maintained that his initial response to Barton was intended to support the female commentators targeted by Barton's remarks.
WHAT THIS MIGHT MEAN
As the trial continues, the outcome could set a significant precedent for how social media conduct is treated under UK law, particularly concerning the balance between free speech and harmful communication. If Barton is found guilty, it may lead to stricter regulations and greater accountability for public figures on social media platforms. Legal experts suggest that this case highlights the growing need for clear guidelines on online harassment and defamation, potentially influencing future legislation. Meanwhile, public figures may become more cautious in their online interactions, aware of the potential legal ramifications of their statements.
Related Articles
French and UK Authorities Intensify Investigations into Elon Musk's X and Grok AI
New Epstein Files Reveal Extensive Ties to Influential Figures Amid Allegations of Document Withholding
Gorton and Denton By-Election: Labour Faces Challenges Amid Scandal and Candidate Announcements
Global Backlash Forces X to Restrict Grok AI Amid Deepfake Controversy
X Faces Scrutiny Over AI-Generated Deepfakes Amid UK Legal Compliance Efforts
MPs Exit X Amid Grok AI Controversy Over Deepfake Images