The Unbiased Post Logo
Sunday 22/02/2026

Convictions in Moss Side Murder Case Referred to Court of Appeal Amid Concerns Over Gang Narrative

Three young men in court for Moss Side murder case appeal
Sofia RomanoSofia Romano

In This Article

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has referred the murder convictions of three men to the Court of Appeal, citing concerns over the use of a "gang narrative" during their trial.
  • Durrell Goodall, Reano Walters, and Trey Wilson were convicted under the "joint enterprise" law for the 2016 murder of Abdul Hafidah in Moss Side, Manchester.
  • The CCRC's referral highlights potential miscarriages of justice, with new evidence suggesting the prosecution's case relied on racial stereotypes.
  • The Greater Manchester Police and Crown Prosecution Service used a rap video and images to allege gang membership, which the defense argues was based on institutional racism.
  • The case raises broader concerns about the application of joint enterprise law, particularly its impact on young black men.

The murder convictions of three young men, Durrell Goodall, Reano Walters, and Trey Wilson, have been referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The move comes amid growing concerns about the use of a "too readily adopted gang narrative" during their trial, which led to their conviction under the controversial "joint enterprise" legal doctrine.

Background of the Case

In 2016, Abdul Hafidah, 18, was brutally murdered in Moss Side, Manchester. The prosecution argued that Goodall, Walters, and Wilson, then aged 20, 19, and 19 respectively, were part of a gang that attacked Hafidah after he entered their territory. The men were convicted of murder in 2017, with life sentences handed down following a second trial. Walters and Wilson were ordered to serve a minimum of 20 years, while Goodall received a 16-year minimum term.

Concerns Over Trial Evidence

The CCRC's decision to refer the case is based on new evidence that challenges the prosecution's portrayal of the defendants as gang members. This evidence includes expert reports criticizing the reliance on a rap video and images from the defendants' phones, which were used to suggest gang affiliation. The defense argues that these elements were based on racial stereotypes and that the trial was marred by institutional racism.

Legal and Social Implications

The "joint enterprise" law, which allows individuals to be convicted of murder if they are found to have encouraged or assisted in the crime, has been a contentious issue. Critics argue that it disproportionately affects young black men, as seen in this case. The CCRC's referral underscores the need for safeguards against unfair trial practices and the potential for miscarriages of justice.

WHAT THIS MIGHT MEAN

The Court of Appeal's decision on this case could have significant legal and social implications. If the convictions are overturned, it may prompt a reevaluation of the joint enterprise law and its application, particularly concerning racial bias. Legal experts suggest that this case could lead to broader reforms in how gang narratives are used in court, ensuring that evidence is not tainted by stereotypes. Additionally, the outcome may influence future prosecutions and the safeguarding of defendants' rights, potentially setting a precedent for similar cases.

Images from the Web

Additional article image
Image Source: GMP
Additional article image
Image Source: GMP
Additional article image
Image Source: Greater Manchester Police