The UK government's proposal to ban the protest group Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000 has sparked significant controversy and debate. The move comes after two members of the group were arrested for allegedly blocking the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol, a defense company accused by activists of supplying weapons to the Israeli military—a claim the company denies.

Arrests and Allegations

On Tuesday, Avon and Somerset Police detained a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man on suspicion of criminal damage and unauthorized entry. The activists reportedly covered the entrance of Elbit Systems with red paint, symbolizing Palestinian bloodshed. This incident is part of a series of protests targeting the company, which has faced previous disruptions.

Government's Proposed Ban

The UK government has laid a draft order before Parliament to classify Palestine Action as a terrorist organization. If approved, it would become illegal to be a member or supporter of the group, with penalties of up to 14 years in prison. The proposal is set for debate in Parliament, with a decision expected by the end of the week.

Legal and Human Rights Concerns

The proposed ban has drawn criticism from various quarters, including legal experts and UN special rapporteurs. In letters to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, groups like the Network for Police Monitoring and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers argue that equating protest with terrorism sets a dangerous precedent. They emphasize that acts of protest, even those causing property damage, should not be treated as terrorism if they do not intend to harm individuals.

Public and Political Reactions

The proposal has also faced opposition from public figures and politicians, including Caroline Lucas and Jeremy Corbyn. Critics warn that proscribing peaceful protest groups could undermine democratic freedoms and civil liberties. A legal challenge against the ban is anticipated, with a hearing scheduled for Friday to determine if the ban can be temporarily blocked.