Wolverhampton City Council has reversed its decision to impose a controversial surcharge on wider burial plots at Danescourt cemetery, following public outcry and criticism labeling the fee as a "fat tax." The proposed charge, which would have increased the cost of a 6ft-wide plot by 20% compared to a standard 5ft grave, was initially justified by the council as a response to the city's rising obesity rates, which stand at 33.3% compared to the national average of 25.9%.

Public Backlash and Council Reversal

The proposal faced significant backlash from residents and funeral directors alike. Ross Hickton, a local funeral director, voiced strong opposition, stating, "It's not really acceptable or fair" to charge more based on the size of a loved one. He emphasized that residents who had contributed to the system through taxes should not face additional costs at such a sensitive time.

Consultation and Criticism

The council had consulted 25 funeral directors, receiving only one objection. However, critics, including Hickton, argued that the consultation process was inadequate and did not involve the public. Wolverhampton resident Rosemarie McLaren described the proposed charge as discriminatory, expressing concern over the financial burden it would impose on larger individuals.

Broader Context and Comparisons

The council's initial stance was that the surcharge was necessary to cover the additional costs associated with larger plots, including extra equipment and soil disposal. Matthew Crawley, chief executive at the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, noted that similar charges are common in other areas, such as Birmingham and Walsall, due to limited cemetery space.

Decision to Halt the Charge

Despite these justifications, the council ultimately decided not to proceed with the surcharge. A spokesperson stated, "No formal decision was ever taken on plans to charge more for larger burial plots," acknowledging the widespread criticism and opting to maintain the status quo.