In a significant move affecting over 2.5 million voters, more than a third of eligible councils in England have requested to postpone their upcoming May elections. This decision comes as part of a broader local government reorganisation aimed at replacing the existing two-tier system of district and county councils with more streamlined unitary councils. The reorganisation, described by the government as a "once-in-a-generation" change, is intended to enhance efficiency in delivering council services such as social care.

Calls for Postponement

According to data from the Association of Electoral Administrators, 27 out of 63 eligible local authorities have sought to delay their elections. Among these are the county councils of East Sussex, West Sussex, and Suffolk, as well as city councils in Exeter, Preston, and Peterborough. Smaller councils, including Cheltenham, Hastings, and Ipswich, have also requested delays. The government has indicated that it will consider these requests on a case-by-case basis, with decisions expected soon.

Debate and Controversy

The proposed postponements have sparked intense debate and criticism. Critics argue that delaying elections undermines the democratic process by denying citizens the opportunity to vote and hold their representatives accountable. Lucy Galvin, Green Party leader in Norwich, warned that "democracy was under attack" during a heated council meeting. Meanwhile, Labour's Michael Stonard, leader of Norwich City Council, defended the move as a pragmatic response to exceptional circumstances, citing the need to focus resources on the reorganisation.

Political Reactions

The majority of councils seeking delays are Labour-led, but the issue has transcended party lines. Some Conservative and Liberal Democrat councils have also supported postponements, citing concerns over capacity and resource allocation. Local Government Secretary Steve Reed argued that running elections for "zombie" councils would divert resources from essential services. However, opposition figures, including Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, have criticized the move, calling it a breach of democratic rights.

Implications for Councillors

If approved, the delay could extend the terms of nearly 600 councillors, including about 200 Labour councillors, who would not have to defend their seats until the reorganisation is complete. This has raised concerns about accountability and the potential for councillors to serve extended terms without a fresh mandate from voters.