UK Government Pressures Abramovich to Release £2.5 Billion for Ukraine Aid
Published 17 December 2025
Highlights
- Roman Abramovich is under pressure to transfer £2.5 billion from the Chelsea FC sale to a humanitarian fund for Ukraine, as pledged in 2022.
- The UK government has issued a final warning, giving Abramovich 90 days to comply or face legal action.
- The funds remain frozen in a UK bank due to disagreements over their use, with Abramovich wanting them to benefit all war victims, including Russians.
- UK sanctions prevent Abramovich from accessing the money, but the proceeds legally belong to him.
- EU leaders are set to discuss using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine's financial needs.
-
Rewritten Article
UK Government Pressures Abramovich to Release £2.5 Billion for Ukraine Aid
The UK government has issued a stern ultimatum to Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich, demanding the release of £2.5 billion from the sale of Chelsea Football Club to support humanitarian efforts in Ukraine. This move comes amid ongoing tensions over the allocation of the funds, which have been frozen in a UK bank account since the club's sale in 2022.
Legal and Financial Standoff
Abramovich, who sold Chelsea FC under pressure following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, had pledged that the proceeds would aid victims of the conflict. However, a deadlock persists over the funds' distribution, with Abramovich advocating for a broader use that includes Russian beneficiaries. The UK government, however, insists the money should exclusively support humanitarian causes in Ukraine.
Sir Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition, emphasized the urgency in the House of Commons, stating, "The clock is ticking on Roman Abramovich to honour the commitment he made when Chelsea FC was sold." He warned that the government is prepared to pursue legal action to ensure the funds reach those affected by what he termed "Putin's illegal war."
Government's Firm Stance
The UK Treasury has clarified that under the terms of the licence issued for the sale, the funds must be directed towards humanitarian efforts and cannot benefit Abramovich or any other sanctioned individuals. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper reiterated the government's resolve, urging Abramovich to comply without resorting to legal delays.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves expressed frustration over the prolonged freeze, calling it "unacceptable" that the funds remain inaccessible. She stressed the government's readiness to take necessary legal steps to ensure the money aids the Ukrainian people.
Broader European Context
As the UK government tightens its stance, EU leaders are poised to discuss proposals to utilize frozen Russian assets to bolster Ukraine's budget and defense needs. This discussion highlights the broader geopolitical implications of the ongoing conflict and the international community's efforts to support Ukraine.
-
Scenario Analysis
If Abramovich fails to comply within the 90-day deadline, the UK government is likely to initiate legal proceedings, potentially prolonging the release of funds. This could set a precedent for how other frozen Russian assets are handled, influencing international legal and diplomatic strategies. Experts suggest that a swift resolution would not only aid Ukraine but also reinforce the effectiveness of sanctions as a tool for international accountability. As the EU considers broader measures, the outcome of this case could impact future policies on frozen assets and humanitarian aid distribution.
The UK government has issued a stern ultimatum to Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich, demanding the release of £2.5 billion from the sale of Chelsea Football Club to support humanitarian efforts in Ukraine. This move comes amid ongoing tensions over the allocation of the funds, which have been frozen in a UK bank account since the club's sale in 2022.
Legal and Financial Standoff
Abramovich, who sold Chelsea FC under pressure following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, had pledged that the proceeds would aid victims of the conflict. However, a deadlock persists over the funds' distribution, with Abramovich advocating for a broader use that includes Russian beneficiaries. The UK government, however, insists the money should exclusively support humanitarian causes in Ukraine.
Sir Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition, emphasized the urgency in the House of Commons, stating, "The clock is ticking on Roman Abramovich to honour the commitment he made when Chelsea FC was sold." He warned that the government is prepared to pursue legal action to ensure the funds reach those affected by what he termed "Putin's illegal war."
Government's Firm Stance
The UK Treasury has clarified that under the terms of the licence issued for the sale, the funds must be directed towards humanitarian efforts and cannot benefit Abramovich or any other sanctioned individuals. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper reiterated the government's resolve, urging Abramovich to comply without resorting to legal delays.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves expressed frustration over the prolonged freeze, calling it "unacceptable" that the funds remain inaccessible. She stressed the government's readiness to take necessary legal steps to ensure the money aids the Ukrainian people.
Broader European Context
As the UK government tightens its stance, EU leaders are poised to discuss proposals to utilize frozen Russian assets to bolster Ukraine's budget and defense needs. This discussion highlights the broader geopolitical implications of the ongoing conflict and the international community's efforts to support Ukraine.
What this might mean
If Abramovich fails to comply within the 90-day deadline, the UK government is likely to initiate legal proceedings, potentially prolonging the release of funds. This could set a precedent for how other frozen Russian assets are handled, influencing international legal and diplomatic strategies. Experts suggest that a swift resolution would not only aid Ukraine but also reinforce the effectiveness of sanctions as a tool for international accountability. As the EU considers broader measures, the outcome of this case could impact future policies on frozen assets and humanitarian aid distribution.
