US Congress Seeks Testimony from Peter Mandelson Over Epstein Ties
Published 13 February 2026
Highlights
- Peter Mandelson has been asked by US Congress members to testify regarding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
- Mandelson, former UK ambassador to the US, is under investigation for allegedly passing market-sensitive information to Epstein.
- The House Oversight Committee seeks Mandelson's cooperation to uncover Epstein's co-conspirators.
- Mandelson has denied any criminal wrongdoing and has resigned from the House of Lords.
- UK police are investigating Mandelson's alleged misconduct in public office.
-
Rewritten Article
US Congress Seeks Testimony from Peter Mandelson Over Epstein Ties
US Congress members have formally requested Peter Mandelson, former UK ambassador to the United States, to testify as part of an ongoing investigation into the criminal operations of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The request, spearheaded by Democratic Representatives Robert Garcia and Suhas Subramanyam, aims to uncover the extent of Epstein's network and identify potential co-conspirators.
Congressional Inquiry
In a letter addressed to Mandelson, the lawmakers emphasized his extensive social and business connections with Epstein, asserting that he holds critical information pertinent to their investigation. They urged Mandelson to participate in a transcribed interview with committee staff, highlighting the gravity of the allegations against Epstein and his associates.
Allegations and Investigations
Mandelson, who served as the UK ambassador to the US until his dismissal in September, is also under scrutiny by the Metropolitan Police. The investigation focuses on claims that he shared market-sensitive government information with Epstein during his tenure as business secretary under Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Documents released by the US Department of Justice suggest Mandelson discussed sensitive financial matters with Epstein, including a potential EU bailout.
Resignation and Denial
In light of these developments, Mandelson has resigned from the House of Lords and relinquished his Labour Party membership. Despite the mounting pressure, he maintains his innocence, stating that he has not engaged in any criminal activity nor acted out of financial self-interest.
Broader Context
The request for Mandelson's testimony follows a similar appeal to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was stripped of his royal titles due to his association with Epstein. Both individuals have consistently denied any wrongdoing. The House Oversight Committee remains committed to unraveling the full scope of Epstein's operations and ensuring accountability for those involved.
-
Scenario Analysis
The unfolding investigation into Peter Mandelson's ties with Jeffrey Epstein could have significant legal and political ramifications. Should Mandelson agree to testify, his statements could provide crucial insights into Epstein's network, potentially implicating other high-profile figures. Conversely, refusal to cooperate might intensify scrutiny and lead to further legal action.
The UK police investigation into Mandelson's alleged misconduct could result in criminal charges if evidence substantiates the claims. This scenario could further strain UK-US diplomatic relations, particularly if additional British officials are implicated.
Experts suggest that the outcome of these investigations could set a precedent for how political figures are held accountable for their associations with criminal enterprises, potentially influencing future legislative reforms aimed at preventing similar abuses of power.
US Congress members have formally requested Peter Mandelson, former UK ambassador to the United States, to testify as part of an ongoing investigation into the criminal operations of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The request, spearheaded by Democratic Representatives Robert Garcia and Suhas Subramanyam, aims to uncover the extent of Epstein's network and identify potential co-conspirators.
Congressional Inquiry
In a letter addressed to Mandelson, the lawmakers emphasized his extensive social and business connections with Epstein, asserting that he holds critical information pertinent to their investigation. They urged Mandelson to participate in a transcribed interview with committee staff, highlighting the gravity of the allegations against Epstein and his associates.
Allegations and Investigations
Mandelson, who served as the UK ambassador to the US until his dismissal in September, is also under scrutiny by the Metropolitan Police. The investigation focuses on claims that he shared market-sensitive government information with Epstein during his tenure as business secretary under Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Documents released by the US Department of Justice suggest Mandelson discussed sensitive financial matters with Epstein, including a potential EU bailout.
Resignation and Denial
In light of these developments, Mandelson has resigned from the House of Lords and relinquished his Labour Party membership. Despite the mounting pressure, he maintains his innocence, stating that he has not engaged in any criminal activity nor acted out of financial self-interest.
Broader Context
The request for Mandelson's testimony follows a similar appeal to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was stripped of his royal titles due to his association with Epstein. Both individuals have consistently denied any wrongdoing. The House Oversight Committee remains committed to unraveling the full scope of Epstein's operations and ensuring accountability for those involved.
What this might mean
The unfolding investigation into Peter Mandelson's ties with Jeffrey Epstein could have significant legal and political ramifications. Should Mandelson agree to testify, his statements could provide crucial insights into Epstein's network, potentially implicating other high-profile figures. Conversely, refusal to cooperate might intensify scrutiny and lead to further legal action.
The UK police investigation into Mandelson's alleged misconduct could result in criminal charges if evidence substantiates the claims. This scenario could further strain UK-US diplomatic relations, particularly if additional British officials are implicated.
Experts suggest that the outcome of these investigations could set a precedent for how political figures are held accountable for their associations with criminal enterprises, potentially influencing future legislative reforms aimed at preventing similar abuses of power.
