In a significant judicial decision, a panel of US judges has voted to replace Alina Habba, a Trump-appointed interim US attorney for New Jersey, with her deputy, Desiree Leigh Grace. This decision, made as Habba's 120-day interim term concluded, has sparked a political clash between the judiciary and the Trump administration.

Judicial Decision and Political Reactions

Alina Habba, who previously served as Donald Trump's personal attorney, was appointed as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor in March. However, her lack of prosecutorial experience and her controversial legal actions against Democratic figures in the state drew criticism. As her interim term ended, judges opted not to confirm her permanently, instead appointing Desiree Leigh Grace, a seasoned prosecutor, to the role.

The decision was met with swift backlash from the Trump administration. Attorney General Pam Bondi accused the judges of undermining the President's Article II powers, a reference to the constitutional authority of the executive branch. Bondi's comments underscore the administration's view that the judiciary's actions were politically motivated.

Democratic Opposition and Legal Controversies

Habba's tenure was marked by legal actions that inflamed tensions with New Jersey Democrats. She faced criticism for pursuing what were described as politically motivated prosecutions, including charges against Newark's mayor and a state representative, which were later dropped. New Jersey Senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim condemned her actions, arguing that she degraded the office and failed to meet the standards required for the role.

Implications for Judicial Independence

The replacement of Habba with Grace, who has been with the US attorney's office since 2016, highlights ongoing debates over judicial independence and the politicization of legal appointments. The decision also comes amid broader discussions about the Senate's "blue slip" tradition, which affects judicial nominations.