US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has stated he did not personally observe survivors before a contentious follow-up strike on a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean on September 2. The incident, which resulted in the deaths of two survivors clinging to the burning boat, has sparked a debate over the legality of US military actions in the region.

During a White House cabinet meeting, Hegseth attributed the decision to the "fog of war," explaining that he watched the initial strike live but left for another meeting before the second strike occurred. "I did not personally see survivors," Hegseth remarked, emphasizing the chaotic nature of the situation. The second strike was authorized by US Navy Admiral Frank Bradley, who was then commander of the Joint Special Operations Command.

Legal and Political Repercussions

The follow-up strike has drawn bipartisan concern, with lawmakers questioning its compliance with international law, particularly the Geneva Convention, which prohibits targeting wounded combatants. The Senate Armed Services Committee has vowed to conduct "vigorous oversight" to uncover the details of the incident.

President Trump defended the military operations as essential for curbing drug trafficking, claiming a significant reduction in maritime drug routes, although he provided no evidence. However, he distanced himself from the decision to conduct the second strike, stating, "we didn't know about" it.

Admiral Bradley's Upcoming Testimony

Admiral Bradley, who has since been promoted to commander of US Special Operations Command, is expected to testify on Capitol Hill. His testimony will be crucial in understanding the decision-making process behind the strike and addressing concerns about US military conduct in the Caribbean.