The Unbiased Post Logo
Sunday 22/02/2026

Google Settles $68 Million Privacy Lawsuit Over Voice Assistant Recordings

Courtroom scene with gavel and voice assistant device
Himanshu KaushikHimanshu Kaushik

In This Article

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Google has agreed to a $68 million settlement over claims that its voice assistant recorded private conversations without consent.
  • The lawsuit alleges that Google Assistant was inadvertently activated, leading to unauthorized recordings used for targeted advertising.
  • The settlement, filed in a California federal court, awaits approval from US District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.
  • Eligible claimants include users of Google devices since May 2016, with legal fees potentially consuming up to one-third of the settlement.
  • This case follows a similar $95 million settlement by Apple over privacy concerns with its Siri assistant.

Google has agreed to pay $68 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging that its voice-activated assistant, Google Assistant, improperly recorded private conversations. The settlement, filed in a federal court in San Jose, California, requires the approval of US District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.

Allegations of Unauthorized Recordings

The lawsuit claims that Google Assistant, designed to activate upon hearing phrases like "Hey Google," was inadvertently triggered, leading to unauthorized recordings. These recordings were allegedly shared with advertisers to facilitate targeted advertising, raising significant privacy concerns among users. Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, has denied any wrongdoing but opted for a settlement to avoid the uncertainties and costs associated with prolonged litigation.

Settlement Details and Eligibility

The settlement covers individuals who have owned Google devices since May 18, 2016, and were affected by these "false accepts." If approved, the settlement will be distributed among numerous claimants, with lawyers for the plaintiffs potentially receiving up to one-third of the total amount, approximately $22 million, as legal fees.

Comparative Context with Apple

This case mirrors a similar situation faced by Apple, which settled for $95 million over allegations that its Siri assistant recorded conversations without user consent. Both tech giants have faced scrutiny over privacy practices, highlighting the ongoing challenges in balancing technological advancements with user privacy.

WHAT THIS MIGHT MEAN

If the settlement receives judicial approval, it could set a precedent for future privacy-related lawsuits against tech companies, potentially prompting stricter regulations on voice-activated technologies. Legal experts suggest that this case underscores the need for clearer guidelines on data privacy and user consent, especially as smart devices become increasingly integrated into daily life. Moving forward, companies may need to enhance transparency and user control over data to mitigate similar legal challenges and maintain consumer trust.